Someone stuck a couple of the stickers shown above on a light pole in the middle of the parking lot where I work some time ago. Though it took awhile for me to get around to looking into it, here goes.
My first question is how exactly this pertains to the location its posted. My workplace is not in Europe (far from it). But maybe the applicability will be found later.
My other (somewhat obvious) question is whether or not this is some sort of anti-immigrant organization.
But I will never know if I do not check. So lets commence.
From their website’s about us page :
European Brotherhood was founded by a group of European Nationalists who care about the future of their land.
We are seeing, day after day, our land destroyed by unscrupulous merchants without respect for Tradition and Identity of their own people. We wondered what we could do to make a change, to gather under one flag all the people who don’t give up and who fight this System.
So we wanted to create a brotherhood, a brotherhood of men and women.
A European Brotherhood!
European Brotherhood, in fact, will not only promote our own line of clothing. Our project is much more ambitious: we want to give dreams, we want to create hope.
We want to create a link between all the European Nationalists, because only if we are united, nobody can stop us.
For too long, the powerful who rule this world played on the divisions among the European people, spreading hate between the nations, to make us hate each other.
It’s time to say stop to this, and put aside our divisions, gathering under the symbol of the Brotherhood.
European Brotherhood wants to offer a product who creates unity.
Our clothing will be the uniform, the armor for every freedom fighter.
Sons of Europe, Brothers, let’s come together. The Battle has begun.
Uh . . . . dammit.
It appears that we have a clothing line, with a message. A message that may or may not be, exactly what I feared it to be.
By the way, what is a European nationalist? Is that not an oxymoron? Europe is a continent, not a nation.
Well, those photos certainly did not put my mind at ease. In fact some put my mind somewhere between 1939 and 1945.
But I could be reading to much into this, being outside of the cultural context of Europe. So lets move on, outside of the den of the organization itself.
The next couple of exerts are from a transcript of an American’s speech at an organization called the National Policy Institute’s forbidden “Future of Europe” conference in Budapest, Hungry. It seems that upper levels of government were not exactly fans of the organizations views. Lets find out why.
It is a great honor to be speaking to you today and I would like to thank the sponsors and organizers for making this wonderful occasion possible.
I have many opportunities to speak to my American friends, so I would like to address my remarks to our European comrades.
I am grateful to be able to speak to you in my native language. We Americans are very bad at foreign languages, and I especially thank all of you in the audience who are making the effort to listen to me in what is for you a second or third language.
We are here to talk about the future of Europe. So why am I, an American, speaking to you?
Of course, it is because although I am a citizen of the United States I am a European. My country was founded by men who were, in every important respect, European. Their language, their religion, their culture, their institutions were all profoundly and exclusively European. Their blood was European. My own ancestors were mostly English but some were Scots, Dutch, and French Huguenot.
Europe is my ancestral home, my spiritual and cultural home
Not to much so far.
But why am I talking about race, at a conference about the future of Europe? It is because there can be no Europe without Europeans. There can be no Europe without people like us. Only men of European stock could have built Europe on my continent, and only men of the same stock can preserve Europe on this continent.
Something tells me that the people that I wrote about in my last entry would have a hayday with this. But lets do this piece by piece. Just because I can.
1.) A Europe without Europeans is simply, a Europe without Europeans. North America does not cease to exist or vanish just because there are no North American’s on the continent.
2.) If the chips were dealt differently, it is entirely possible that some other pigmentation then white (by which I mean European!) could have been running the continent, and doing just as good a job as the current bunch.
a.) When were using the word “preserve”, are we talking ecologically? If that is the case, then it be a hard sell for many to swallow world wide. Even I have to acknowledge that where “Europeans” go, ecological stability tends not to be a priority.
b.) I can think of another way this could be interpreted, but I certainly hope its incorrect. Out of fear of a repeat of history.
The threat to Europe everywhere is very great. As you may know, in 1960, the population of the United States was 90 percent white. Until 1965 the United States had immigration laws that were designed to keep it European. Since that change in policy, non-white immigrants have poured into the United States, and now my country is only 62 or 63 percent white. Current projections are that in just 28 years, whites will be a minority.
My country is rapidly ceasing to be an outpost of Europe, and with catastrophic results. And yet, rather than recognize catastrophe or understand its cause, Americans are determined to believe that catastrophe is not catastrophe–that it is instead a blessing.
Well, that clears things up.
The official ideology of America is that “Diversity is our strength,” and by diversity is meant every possible mix of race, language, religion etc. Many people will tell you that “diversity is America’s greatest strength.”
Of course, diversity is a terrible weakness. It pits different groups against each other and destroys trust. In every part of the world, when peoples who are different in language, religion, or race try to share the same territory, there is conflict. This is virtually a law of nature, but American ideology attempts to rewrite the laws of nature.
Well then . . . .
Language, religion and race are human oriented traits. While there is a tendency to have violence in the natural world (with some of our behaviors traceable back to this), that still does not make such acts excusable. Not when we are more aware of such tendencies then any other creatures.
This viewpoint simply accepts and puts aside the reality of irrational conflict, because its “natures law”. It be one thing if we were talking about some other species in the animal kingdom (even other types of apes!), but not a species with the intelligence to SEE how irrational these actions are.
This view is as lazy as it is dangerous.
The American worship of diversity is sometimes comical. At one time, General George Casey was in overall command of the American forces in Iraq. He said, and I quote, “I firmly believe that the strength of our army comes from our diversity.” He is saying that the US Army is strong, not because it has better equipment or better training, but because it has blacks and Mexicans and Filipinos in it. This is the sort of crazy thing Americans love say.
The American “diversity” ideology really means national suicide through immigration: the replacement of European people by non-Europeans.
I wonder, where have I heard this before? Only back then it was Communists and Jews destroying the motherland (if memory serves).
Also, Alabama DID outlaw and deport all its “Non-European” immigrants. The result was that the agricultural industry pretty much collapsed after the hardest workers in that sector were all deported out of state. Because as it turns out, down home murican’s are not nearly as hard working as they tout themselves to be.
“They took our jobs” turned to “Fuck this shit!”.
That was just a snipet from the tail end of the segment, but I highly recommend it to everyone. When I was watching I laughed so hard that I nearly fell off the couch.
I am done with the “speech” noted earlier. You can follow the link and read it if you wish, but as far as I am concerned, I have seen enough to judge it a work of racist propaganda garbage. The civil war (of the US) and WW1 (and 2) are regarded as “unfortunate”, though not for reasons you may be thinking. More, because they pitted “Europeans” against one another and spilled “European” blood needlessly.
So frankly, FUCK THE EUROPEAN BROTHERHOOD.
And fuck your stupid propaganda stickers, they are coming down. Stick em in public and its someone else’s problem. But though I have disagreements with my workplace, even I have respect enough to not want the business to have even PASSIVE exposure to this toxic ideology.
It appears that either I forgot to link the source of the speech reffered to earlier, or the original source was taken down (and thus the link broken automatically). But I found it again on the speakers (Mr Jared Taylor, white nationalist) blog .
Which is unfortunate, since the link may result in a ping back on his end. But whatever.
I stand by my viewpoints as stated before. The views expressed are dangorous and helpful to noone.
And as to those reffering to this little write up as propaganda . . . read Mr Taylors speech.