To think that this was penned back in 2013 . . .
Where is the line between disagreement and treason?
Many on the right, insist that Obama is terrible. And they throw the term treason around, in regards to him and his actions. Not at all surprising, as any word that fits, is usable in the bubble (no matter how irrelevant, or wrong, it may be).
But the fact is, if the roles of the current were reversed, and it was Obama’s democrats and the left that was in the place of the current right, there would be hell to pay. If it was Obama’s party that was crying fowel and keeping (and sacraficing) the nation over a disagreement, people would not stand for it. They would use the word treasonous, and frankly, it would fit. Because from what I can see, that is exactly what this behaver amounts to.
Yet, somehow the right is the “patriotic” side.
Don’t get me…
View original post 332 more words